Theme 7. Sharing International Experiences in Disasters: Summary and Action Plan
Prehosp Disast Med 2001;16(1):42-45.
1. General Safety, Department of National Defence, CANADA
2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, Massachusetts USA
3. Consultant, EQE International, Irvine, California, USA
4. Major, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
5. Trauma Surgeon, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA
6. Faculty of Naval Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, REPUBLIC OF CHINA
7. Department of Surgery, Uludag University Medical School, Bursa, TURKEY
8. Captain, CFB EXQUIMALT, Victoria, British Columbia, CANADA
9. Director of Operations, Essex Ambulance Service NHS Trust, UNITED KINGDOM
10. Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Therapy, Civic Hospital, Palermo, ITALY
11. Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, JAPAN
12. Kiev Medical Academy of Postgraduate Training, Ukranian Center of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Kiev, UKRAINE
13. Kunskapscentrum Prehospen, Borås, SWEDEN
Keywords: Asia-Pacific; command structure; communications; disaster; experiences; military; mitigation; planning; prevention; responses; security
Introduction: The discussions in this theme provided an opportunity to share specific experiences with disasters that occurred outside of the Asia-Pacific Rim.
Methods: Details of the methods used are provided in the preceding paper.1 The chairs moderated all presentations and produced a summary that was presented to an assembly of all of the delegates. Since the findings from the Theme 7 and Theme 3 groups were similar, the chairs of both groups presided over one workshop that resulted in the generation of a set of action plans that then were reported to the collective group of all delegates.
Results: The main points developed during the presentations and discussion included: (1) disaster response planning, (2) predetermined command and organizational structure, (3) rapid response capability, (4) mitigation, and (5) communications and alternatives.
Discussion: The action plans presented are in common with those presented by Theme 3, and include: (1) plan disaster responses including the different types, identification of hazards, training based on experiences, and provision of public education; (2) improving coordination and control; (3) maintaining communications assuming infrastructure breakdown; (4) maximizing mitigation through standardized evaluations, creation of a legal framework, and recognition of advocacy and public participation; and (5) providing resources and knowledge through access to existing therapies, using the media, and increasing decentralization of hospital inventories.
Conclusions: Most of the problems that occurred outside the Asia-Pacific rim relative to disaster management are similar to those experienced within it. They should be addressed in common with the rest of the world.
Braham M, Aghababian R, Andrews RA; Austin C, Brown R, Yao Zhong Chen, Engindeniz Z, Girouard R, Leaman P, Masellis M, Nakayama S, Polentsov YO, Suserud BO: 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Disaster Medicine. Theme 7. Sharing international experiences in disasters: Summary and action plan. Prehosp Disast Med 2001;16(1):42-45.
Return to PDM Home Page
Return to Tables of Content